October 8, 2013 2 Comments
Sex Box aired tonight on Channel 4 at 10pm. As promised it featured 3 couples having sex in a sound proof and opaque box. Whilst they were doing that we had vox pop interviews with people on the street and some discussion with the panel of Philip Hodson, Tracey Cox and Dan Savage.
Although the main hook of the show was that it featured a couple having sex in a box this wasn’t the main focus – in fact the box may as well not have been there. Most of the show was a series of unscripted and ‘as live’ discussions which (for the most part) were informative and useful. The couples were given lots of time to talk which made them particularly interesting. The panellists made some good points about communication and different kinds of sexual activity other than intercourse (at times).
The tone of the show was pretty sensible, measured and matter of fact. Some of the Bingo Boxes were defiantly un-ticked and in fact it was pretty good on the following:
The participants in the show were really interesting, fun, open and engaged. They represented a different ages, sexualities and abilities (there was a couple with disabilities, sadly they weren’t on screen for very long) and weren’t the kind of ‘conventionally attractive’ that TV programmes generally focus on.
Although there was the usual worry about Sex Ed not being good enough for young people (which is mostly true) the show did offer some good advice on what good Sex Ed could achieve as well as offering some communication tips.
There was a discussion about threesomes in which Tracey Cox said they were a bad idea and Dan Savage said that this wasn’t necessarily the case and has had several with his husband. This reframed the discussion as something that ‘normal’ people do, even presenters.
There was no discussion about a particular sex toy or product or drug and as such steered clear of a purely medicalisation and marketisation (if that’s a word) of sex.
A lot of time was given about how to talk about the kind of sex that we might want rather than simply having the sex we feel we should have. Although there was still a lot of focus on intercourse, particularly for the straight couples (see below).
Despite the good stuff we reckoned the show ticked 7 boxes. Most problematic was how bisexual, trans* and asexual folk were ignored and the assumption that everyone wants sex. Most of the show was a live discussion where in the heat of the moment and in front of a studio audience some mistakes could be made, so I think some allowances could perhaps be made for that.
The first couple in the box referred to ‘sex’, they were briefly challenged by the panel about what this means but this didn’t continue. They said that they once had ‘sex’ for 3 hours – unpicking what kind of sex happened in those 3 hours may have been interesting. There was actually much more discussion about intercourse when we saw the gay couple where the panel were discussing the assumptions we make about same sex couples and thus also different gender couples (though they were saying ‘gay sex’ a lot which was annoying). The last couple challenged themselves when they talked about sex which was interesting, but the panel were talking about ‘sex as intercourse’ for parents. This is a shame because many people who might be too tired for ‘sex’ (whether this is due to parenting or work or illness) may feel that there are many different kinds of sex they could explore having.
During the conversation with the second couple Hodson asked about whether one or both of them had an orgasm. This was framed as orgasm being the only point of sexual activity. The couple later talked about hugging, touch and closeness, which was great.
This square was crossed off almost immediately and was repeated throughout the show. Not everyone feels sexual desire all through their lives and some people don’t feel it at all and identify as such.
There was a dodgy stat suggesting that the majority of young people have looked at porn. EU Kids Online suggests that it’s only a minority of young people.
There was absolutely no mention of bisexuality in the whole show, which was a real shame.
At the beginning of the show some very basic cause and effect claims were asserted about young people, porn and their sexual practices. None of this is born out by research, which doesn’t demonstrate any causality. Good on Dan Savage for pointing out that we need to help young people to be more critical and literate consumers of porn though.
Here’s a storify from the discussion on twitter last night.
There’s a summary and YouTube link to the programme in our shorter blog post here.